The Firm has a national reputation in class action litigation, which constitutes a major portion of the Firm's overall practice. The Firm has handled various national class actions involving topics such as consumer fraud, discrimination in the provision of credit, and defective products like hardboard siding, synthetic stucco and roofing shingles.


Current Cases

  • Amico, et al. v. General Motors Corporation
    Case No. CV-2004-092816, (Superior Court of Arizona for the County of Maricopa). Arizona class action seeking compensation for the defective nature of General Motors' intake manifold gaskets. Class certification included all persons residing in Arizona who previously owned or leased GM motor vehicl... read more>

  • Bertino, et al. v. General Motors, Corporation
    Case No. CV025770 (Superior Court of California, Joaquin County). California class action seeking compensation for the defective nature of General Motors’ intake manifold gaskets. Class certification included all residents of the State of California who continue to own or lease, new or used GM veh... read more>

  • City of St. Petersburg, et al. v. Total Containment, Inc., et al.
    United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, 1:06-cv-20953. Class action involving the marketing and sale of defective thermoplastic flexible piping intended to convey and contain petroleum fuels from underground storage tanks to above-ground fuel dispensers. Facility owners with this... read more>

  • McAdams, et al. v. Monier, Inc.
    Case No. SVC 16410 (Superior Court of the State of California, Placer County). Cunningham, Bounds serves as counsel in this class action brought on behalf of homeowners and others whose roofs are tiled with slurry-coated MonierLifetiles, Monier, and "Monray" tiles. In December 2005, the Superior Cou... read more>

  • Spectrum Stores, Inc., et al. v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation
    CV-H-06-3569. (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division). A Lawsuit has been filed against Citgo targeting the corporate interests of Venezuela who currently does business in the United States through Citgo which is 100% wholly owned by Venezuela. The antitrust sui... read more>

  • Boudin v. ATM Holdings, Inc. d/b/a ATM Corporation of America
    United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, 1:07-cv-07-00018-WS-C. This is a class action on behalf of residential mortgage borrowers who allege violations of TILA, HOEPA, and RESPA in connection with the closing of their mortgage loan. On September 12, 2007, the... read more>

  • Edwards, et al. v. Accredited Home Lenders Inc., et al.
    United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, 07-cv-00160 KD-C. Class action on behalf of residential mortgage borrowers who allege violations of TILA, HOEPA and RESPA in connection with the closing of their mortgage loan. Discovery is ongoing and class certificati... read more>

  • Hall-Frazier v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. d/b/a Home Funds Direct
    United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama, Southern Division, 1:08-cv-11-MHT. This is an action on behalf of residential mortgage borrowers who allege violations of TILA, HOEPA and RESPA in connection with the closing of their mortgage loan. Discovery is ongoing and Plaintiff’s moti... read more>

  • Lemley, et al. v. Liberty Title Company, LLC, et al.
    United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama, Western Division, 7:06-cv-2076-HGD. This is an action on behalf of residential mortgage borrowers who allege violations of TILA, HOEPA and RESPA in connection with the closing of their mortgage loan. Case was stayed by District Court unti... read more>

  • Loudermilk Services, Inc., et al. v. Marathon Ashland Petroleum, L.L.C.,
    3:04-CV-00966 (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). Cunningham, Bounds serves as lead counsel for Plaintiffs alleging that MAP sold contaminated gas to hundreds of West Virginia service stations which caused serious problems to their underground storage tanks and equi... read more>

  • Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama v. Hodurski
    Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama v. Hodurski, Alabama Supreme Court Case No. 1022154. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed a Montgomery County Circuit Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff class members (physician and two physician assistants as representatives of the... read more>

  • In re HealthSouth Corporation Securities Litigation
    CV-03-BE-1500. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division). Cunningham Bounds is co-lead counsel for plaintiff bondholders in a claim against HealthSouth, Richard Scrushy and others for fraudulent statements concerning the company’s finances, which resulted in the l... read more>

  • Clark v. United States of America
    United States Court of Federal Claims, Case No. 00-644C. Nationwide class action on behalf of all members of the National Guard concerning compensation owed to Guard members for completion of mandatory correspondence course work. The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington ruled that compensation is du... read more>